Recently in Picnic Category

Picnic: Post Performance Notes. Question: What makes for a good performance?

| | Comments (0)
View blog reactions | Total Views (4) | Sphere: Related Content

Answer: Motivation to have one.

For me, a good performance never just happens on it's own. What's always helped my motivation:

  • Before each performance, identify a trouble spot and then work on it and then the night's performance goal will be to use what I've learned. (But I've got to find the time to do this before each performance).
  • Each night before bed, mentally rehearse -- see myself going through the scene, the blocking.
  • Pre-performance procedure: rehearse the beats explicitly @ home before the show. Mentally rehearse before I go on -- stay quiet, focused, apart (if need be) from the other actors. Do this before every performance to maximize the chances of doing my best.

 

Closing Night. Picnic (William Inge), Howard & Rosemary, Showcase Notes: 7PM, Weist-Barron, 35 West 45th Street, Thursday December 15, 2005, New York City

| | Comments (0)
View blog reactions | Total Views (15) | Sphere: Related Content

          Snow lightly falling in Bryan Park, New Yorkers ice skating under a transluent Christmas tree, a magically lit Empire State Building rising over a bright nightime cityscape down from 34th street . . . it's Christmas in the City.


       The showcase closed tonight. Once again, can't remember too many personal projects where I put in more time and energy -- and having agents and casting directors in the audience each night is certainty motivating. Much of my effort this time focused, more than it ever has before -- not on "analysis," really (I'm not sure what that is now) -- but on these imaginative forages into the world of Howard and Rosemary and Independence KS, c. 1953. More of the forage was into Howard's world, who he was around the time to the scene, his larger life, his deeper concerns. And I loved doing it, loved intuitively discovering him and his world.

      Two things seems to happen that I don't fully understand -- I had very clear images of Howard, yet they seemed to come from an idea of him, a spontaneous idea of him, but an idea nevertheless, and surprisingly, it was not that helpful. While my writings -- at least I tried to do this -- stayed firmly grounded in the emotional terrain of Howard (where the writing really did help), the images of him nevertheless had an effect, i.e., a nice guy, and mid-west 40 year boyish businessman, a boy at heart . . . and from these strong images came strong inferences (for lack of a better word) of what he was like, his behaviors, his attitudes . . . and, as beautiful and as wonderful as they were, they -- at least at times -- got in the way of some deeper and wholly unexpected aspects of Howard, aspects found deep within myself . . . parts of me I didn't ever really see or experience . . . and it's where truth lay.
      If I give into that . . . I don't know where I'll go . . . but in the end -- I'll find Howard, and I guess I don't know what I'll find, but I have absolute unshakeable faith that it will be him . . . it has to be . . . there's nothing else to guide me.
      This, I think, is the trust in myself that I'm looking for. The images are almost predictable, familiar, safe. I need to move away from that and into this space where I'm almost blind . . .where I don't know where I'm going. It's where astonishment is . . . and where I cross into eternity. It's way more than just acting for me . . . it's reaching into this eternal space which seems to hold absolutely nothing for me . . . and then I discover myself.


        Anyway . . . ah yes, I almost forgot. I did something quite controversial -- actually, it's not controversial: it's suppose to be an outright bad idea, and there is, as far as I can tell, uniform agreement on this, and while I understand and appreciate the rational . . . it's never, really, made a lot of sense to me. The advice is:

    never watch an actor do a performance that you're going to do . . .

    The rational, the danger, is that one will try to "do" what that actor is doing at the expense of one's own unique contribution, that it will unduly influence you. These are real concerns, but I think they are overblown, or at least more of a concern for professional accomplished actors rather than the student or the beginner, and even then I'm not so sure . . .

    The power of example

     Albert Bandura thinks that classical learning theory's preoccupation with trial-and-error learning is shortsighted. "Coping with the demands of everyday life would be exceedingly trying if one could arrive at solutions to problems only by actually performing possible options and suffering the consequences. Bandura says it's fortunate that people learn from vicarious observation, since mistakes could prove costly or fatal.
     -
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY of Albert Bandura

    Despite these dangers, I felt that the power of example outweighed all other factors, and so . . . I was very curious to see how a professional tackled the role of Howard, and so before the opening, I rented and watched the 1995 production of Picnic where Howard is played by Arthur O'Connell (there's been more recent productions, and I'm going to try to watch those as well).

    What I learned.

     Frankly, before I hit the play button, I was worried about consciously or unconsciously trying to imitate Arthur O'Connell (who did the original stage play of Picnic, and then won an Oscar-nomination for "best supporting actor" for role), but once the scene started, it was amazing -- I was immediately drawn into what he was doing as an actor -- Howard, his take on him, just fell away, and I observed the craft, i.e.,

  • He was, at all times, listening closely to Rosemary, and I could see him reacting to her -- I was not doing this. I just knew when I saw this that I was not listening that closely, and that was a source of so many of my difficulties
  • Many times Howard has one word responses, e.g., "well," and each time I packed so much into that one word, but ... I didn't get it, and it never felt right. Often these one word responses were in sections where R is doing much of the talking. I saw Arthur listening intensely, I could see the reaction inside, a thought or feeling building and then, when R paused, H would utter this one word, and I saw that it was the start of some thought he wanted to express, but then R would cut him off. One entire beat in the scene was completely decode for me when I saw this (i.e., at the end of the beat, that thought was finally expressed, but it built throughout the beat, so simply, so beautifully) -- I wasn't listening and letting myself react nearly to the extent that Arthur was.
  • Every line -- it had a specific, clear meaning. Again, I simply wasn't being specific enough in many places . . .

      It was the best experience watching him. It was like a dream, like a window opening and light pouring into a room that was shrouded in fuzzy shadows and vague shapes. Suddenly it was 1000% more clear to me what I need to do. While I guess I'll never know for sure, I feel that seeing this improved by own performance by 200% . . . or more. When I dream of being an actor, this is what I dream about: what I saw him do.

     And did I imitate? I think if I put my performance up side by side next to Arthur O'Connell (though I would NOT want to see that comparison), Ithink I'd find my choices, in many cases, where quite different from his. I loved his Howard, but I could never imitate what he did -- it just wouldn't be who I am, what I saw as Howard's needs and wants, and it just would not have been what I was able to give to the part.

     Someday, someday . . . I would love to be a great actor (& I don't, really, even know what means . . . but god . . . I'd love to find out)

First Performance. Picnic (William Inge), Howard & Rosemary, Post (1st)-Showcase notes: 7PM, Weist-Barron, 35 West 45th Street, Monday December 12, 2005, New York City

| | Comments (0)
View blog reactions | Total Views (11) | Sphere: Related Content

Notes and Discovery . . .

      Notes

  1. Last night started well (starting well -- always a good thing), but then something happened -- a part of the set wasn't set, and P had to deal with it, and I was watching her deal with it and then my concentration broke, i.e., for a few seconds, I was acutely aware I was 'performing' in front of about 10-15 people in a very small studio room . . . I let my concentration break . . .
  2. You said you were gonna marry me, Rosemary told me, and I didn't feel anything -- why? I remember telling myself, 'ok, don't anticipate this,' and of course, that was anticipation right there, anticipation because my attention was not where it needed to be. Next time, focus on the time, the real time -- set my watch to H & R's world, 12:30, 1am -- and start calculating how much time I have before I have to get up. Let myself be surprised by Rosemary saying this and then we'll see what happens ...
  3. just before the No, the need to buy time wasn't there. Why? You can be here in the morning, Rosemary says.Next time -- really hear her, i.e., if I don't do or say something . . . I'm getting married, tomorrow, in the morning!
  4. From the very beginning, I've always felt an enormous amount of compassion for Rosemary, as most people do, and I'm sure that Howard does too -- yet, my main concern is to how to get out of this, to buy time, etc. I don't want to marry her, but I do love her -- but I don't want to marry her and I have this awareness, especially near the end of how I'm afraid this will hurt her . . . but still -- no way am I gonna say yes. For a while -- I don't know why -- I fought this feeling of compassion, this awareness of what Rosemary is going though, and -- I take that back: I do know why -- it's an obstacle, it could make me cave in . . . yet . . . Next time, stay in touch with it, in fact, stay fully in touch with it, but still, I've got to leave her tonight in order to think all this though. If I can let the compassion out, experience this w/out letting it stop me, I think that would be a fine contribution to Howard, and it would really do justice to who he is, what he is, and what he's trying to do. It makes him human . . . perhaps because I'm able to use the best part of me . . .

      Discovery (a important trick get better and better at)

  • Letting my idea of the character determine a moment -- a BAD idea.
  • Letting go of an idea of the character -- a GREAT idea.

      Beat's 5 and 6 were always awkward, but I always tried to "act" as I imagined the character would act . . . acting from my "head," an idea of the character, and yet over two weeks ago, Howard told me how he felt, and this was something I never -- when I often sat back and "thought" about it -- imagined at all. My idea got in the way and for the last two weeks, I overlooked what was right in front of me -- or maybe it just took that long to learn how to use what Howard had given me (am I really that slow?) . . . anyway, what finally happened on opening night I added to my 12 . 11 . 2005 notes, and it all came together very nicely, a 1000% improvement over whatever the hell it was I doing before . . .

    . . . it was if Howard took over a part of the me to do what he needed to do

 

About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the Picnic category.

Other People is the previous category.

The Adding Machine is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Success Magazine

Success is a business magazine about and for real people -- and for ACTORS too! Each issue of Success brings readers stories of real people who have achieved success in business and in life, and described, step-by-step, how they got there and how you can too! Click on the image below to subscribe today!

Success
NYTimes Theatre Feed

Powered by Movable Type 4.01

About Me

Invited Contributors

Reading Writers

S'il vous plaît Visiter

Books & Broadway